primary antibodies against ace (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Primary Antibodies Against Ace, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/primary+antibodies+against+ace/pmc13071079-266-9-13?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 91 stars, based on 3 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Bioengineered iPSC-derived human macrophages with increased angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) expression suppress solid tumor growth"
Article Title: Bioengineered iPSC-derived human macrophages with increased angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) expression suppress solid tumor growth
Journal: Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
doi: 10.1038/s41392-026-02650-3
Figure Legend Snippet: Determination of anti-tumor activity of iMac with induced ACE expression, in vitro. a Proliferation of melanoma (SK-MEL-28), Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC: HCC1806), and FP chemotherapy resistant HNSCC (FaDu/FP-R) cell lines cultured alone or indirectly co-cultured with iMac ( ± Dox) using 3.0 µm pore polyester membrane inserts for 5 days. Total and dead cell counts were determined via trypan blue exclusion on days 1, 3, and 5. b , c Quantification of iNOS and interleukin-12 (IL-12) production in Cnt-iMac and ACE-iMac treated with LPS (500 ng/ml, 12 h), ± Dox. d ROS production in ACE-iMac following LPS stimulation (1 µg/ml, 30 min) ±Dox, assessed by DCFDA (2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate) staining. Representative histograms (left) and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) quantification (right) are shown. Nitric Oxide (NO) production in ACE-iMac stimulated with LPS (75 ng/ml) for 24 h ( e ), and/or conditioned with SK-MEL-28 supernatant for 24 h ( f ) ± Dox. g Perforin and IFN-γ levels in human peripheral blood NK and Tc cells, respectively, after co-culture with Cnt-iMac or ACE-iMac pretreated with LPS (24 h), followed by melanoma conditioning (24 h). To induce ACE expression, myeloid progenitors were differentiated in the presence of Dox and maintained at 1 µg/ml throughout all in vitro assays. Experiments were performed in triplicates across three independent replicates. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA ( a ), two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction ( b , c , g ), and two-sided unpaired Student’s t -test ( d – f ). Data are presented as means ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Expressing, In Vitro, Cell Culture, Membrane, Staining, Fluorescence, Co-Culture Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Analysis of anti-tumor macrophage activation in the TME post-iMac treatment. Tumors were harvested and single-cell suspensions were prepared for flow cytometry analysis as detailed in the methods section (refer to Fig. ). a Gating strategy for distinguishing M1 and M2 macrophages using flow cytometry based on surface marker immunostaining. b Assessment of CD86 + (M1) and CD206 + (M2) expression in tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) in SK-MEL-28-derived xenografts (±Dox). The bar plot presents FACS quantification of M1 and M2 populations ( n = 5/group). c Assessment of arginase expression in TAMs. d ACE expression in TAMs. e – g Measurement of proinflammatory and anti-tumor markers IFN-γ, IL-12, and iNOS (left: representative histogram; right: mean fluorescence intensity) in TAMs in melanoma xenografts ( n = 5/group). Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sided unpaired Student’s t -test for comparisons in ( b , d , g ), and one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons in ( c , e , f ). Data are presented as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Single Cell, Flow Cytometry, Marker, Immunostaining, Expressing, Derivative Assay, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: The effect of ACE-iMac treatment on human immune cells in a humanized mouse tumor model. a Growth of SK-MEL-28 tumors in humanized BLT-NSG mice; comparing tumor volumes between PBS, iMac and ACE-iMac treated groups. b Representative images of tumors are shown (see Supplementary Fig. for additional images). c Final tumor volumes on Day 28 post-implantation. d Tumor weight on Day 28 post-implantation. Flow cytometry analysis of anti-tumor activation of human CD8 T cells in the TME, measured by intracellular IFN-γ ( e ) and perforin ( f ) in tumor-infiltrating CD3 + CD8 + T cells at sacrifice on Day 28 post-implantation. g Flow cytometry analysis of anti-tumor activation of NK cells, measured by intracellular IFN-γ in tumor-infiltrating CD45 + CD56 + NK cells in the TME on Day 28. The flow cytometry gating strategy for identifying human immune cells is provided in Supplementary Fig. . One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons was used to analyze group comparisons. Data are presented as means ± SEM ( n = 9–10). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and **** p < 0.0001
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Activation Assay



